Medical Info Convinces Oregon Utility Board to Votes for “Opt-In” on Smart Meters, No fines for saying “No thanks!”

628x471 chicken with smetersOregon Municipal Utility Board Votes for “Opt-In” Approach to Smart Meters

Posted on November 24, 2013 VIDEO OF MEDICAL PRESENTATION:

EUGENE, OR — The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB), founded in 1911, is Oregon’s largest customer-owned utility and provides electricity and water to more than 86,000 homes, business, schools and other customers in Eugene, Oregon.

On October 1, 2013, EWEB Commissioners voted unanimously to move forward with an advanced metering project that takes an “opt-in” approach in which customers will choose whether to have an advanced meter or keep their existing meter.

The opt-in approach is a departure from initial plans that called for EWEB to provide an “opt-out” strategy, in which meters would be installed for everyone by 2017 in a large-scale “rollout,” unless they choose to opt-out.  Opt-in is described as “all about customer choice.”

Only customers who say they want the new so-called smart meters will get them.  The decision should quiet much of the criticism of EWEB’s long-debated smart meter program.  Those who worry about the health effects of smart meter transmissions won’t have to do anything to avoid unwanted exposure.  Those who fear that smart meters will lead to a loss of privacy can keep the meters they have now.

According to an EWEB Memorandum dated September 24, 2013, a staff recommendation was made to the Commissioners to adopt what was referred to as “Alternative 2”:

“Alternative 2 focuses on development of strategic programs and benefits.  It would rely on an opt-in strategy and customer choice.  It is not the original big roll out concept with some customers opting out.  Instead, it is envisioned as a slower development that could take several years.  Management believes that the focus on Alternative 2 would allow EWEB to fully explore and develop the strategic benefits which really are ultimately the most important benefits of the AMI system. … This concept is a departure from the ‘one-size-fits-all’ utility model.  However, given the complexity of the world we face and the challenges before us, flexibility and change are necessary.”

Although the “opt-in” approach as viewed as reasonably positive, many local smart grid opponents would have preferred “Alternative 0” which would have delayed rollout of smart meters for at least ten years.  In any case, under the provisions of the option approved by Commissioners, no customers — neither those who opt in, nor those who stayed out — would face any fees for their choices, EWEB says.

A possible factor in the Eugene, Oregon, utility Commissioners voting for the maximum “customer choice” option may have been an impressive presentation given by Dr. Paul Dart describing the inadequacy of the current radiofrequency exposure guidelines used to protect the public.  This presentation was given at a special public session of the EWEB on July 23, 2013.

Dr. Dart was part of a local medical advisory group that had spent 18 months researching the current medical literature on the biological or “non-thermal” effects of microwave radio frequency transmissions, in an effort to assist the Eugene Water and Electric Board in making prudent decisions on their choices of technology as they considered installing an AMI infrastructure of wireless “smart” electric meters.

Among the materials presented to the EWEB by Dr. Dart and several other doctors were the following conclusions:

“Existing scientific research offers strong evidence that the chronic exposure of the public to microwave RF transmissions produces serious acute and chronic health effects in a significant portion of the population.  These findings can be summarized in the following precepts:

Basic Precepts for Residential Exposures to RF Transmissions:

  • Excessive RF exposure can cause acute problems (headaches, insomnia, fatigue, vertigo, tinnitus, other symptoms of EHS).
  • Excessive RF exposure can also cause chronic problems (oxidative stress, cancer, male infertility).
  • Constant RF transmission is probably harmful, even at low levels, and should be avoided.
  • Frequent and repetitive intermittent transmissions are also probably harmful, and should be avoided.
  • Nocturnal exposures are more problematic than daytime exposures, because of RF’s potential to suppress nocturnal melatonin secretion and disturb sleep, and because night is the time when we rest and heal from stresses (including oxidative stress).
  • Occasional and infrequent daytime exposures are much less likely to cause an increase in chronic problems for the population at large.
  • Occasional and infrequent daytime exposures are still likely to provoke acute symptoms in a small percentage of the population.

EWEB should adopt a policy of minimizing their RF footprint in the community. 

A recognition of the [above] precepts should lead EWEB to adopting a policy of minimizing their infrastructure’s RF footprint in the community as much as possible during regular operations.  This doesn’t mean that staff would throw away their cell phones and communicate by semaphore.  But it would mean that instead of combatting or ignoring the possibility that more RF in the community could cause harm, EWEB should acknowledge the potential risks of excessive residential exposure.”

… Sounds like well-founded advice for all.

Although over an hour in length, feel free to watch the entire presentation given by Dr. Dart on July 23, 2013.  A YouTube video is provided below although some of the audio quality could have been better.


Tags: , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.